-
Latest uploads at -. Looking for notes at -? We have lots of notes, study guides and study notes available for your school.
-
46
-
3
-
9
All courses for -
-
Chemistry 1
-
CSS curent affairs 1
-
EVV 1
Latest notes & summaries -
PHIL 347 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
Briefly state how the text defines " claim" 
refers to the statement that the maker of the argument is seeking to show to be true or probably true. 
 
 
Briefly state how the text defines "reason" 
sentences in the argument that are used to show that the conclusion is true or probably true 
 
 
Construct a definition of the term "argument" 
​An argument is two or more statements, at least one of which serves as evidence to sup...
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 1 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
Preview 1 out of 1 pages
PHIL 347 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
Briefly state how the text defines " claim" 
refers to the statement that the maker of the argument is seeking to show to be true or probably true. 
 
 
Briefly state how the text defines "reason" 
sentences in the argument that are used to show that the conclusion is true or probably true 
 
 
Construct a definition of the term "argument" 
​An argument is two or more statements, at least one of which serves as evidence to sup...
PHIL347: Checkpoint 1 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
making an argument 
refer to the process of giving one or more reasons in support of a claim 
 
[Claim] Encephalitis (swelling of the brain) cannot be said to be a side effect of measles vaccination. [Reason] Here's why: "This happens so rarely—less than once in a million shots—that experts can't be sure whether the vaccine is the cause or not." 
 
 
claim 
refers to the statement that the maker 
of the argument i...
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 3 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
Preview 1 out of 3 pages
PHIL347: Checkpoint 1 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
making an argument 
refer to the process of giving one or more reasons in support of a claim 
 
[Claim] Encephalitis (swelling of the brain) cannot be said to be a side effect of measles vaccination. [Reason] Here's why: "This happens so rarely—less than once in a million shots—that experts can't be sure whether the vaccine is the cause or not." 
 
 
claim 
refers to the statement that the maker 
of the argument i...
Phil 347 FINAL Complete Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
Cosmological argument 
Argues for the idea that the universe has a beginning. This argument follows the idea that all empirical things are in a state of generation and decay and therefore the universe is material and was created. 
 
 
Plato's cosmological argument premises 
1.) everything that begins to exists has a cause distinct from itself 
2.) the universe has a beginning 
3.) hence the universe has a cause distinc...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 6 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 2 out of 6 pages
Phil 347 FINAL Complete Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
Cosmological argument 
Argues for the idea that the universe has a beginning. This argument follows the idea that all empirical things are in a state of generation and decay and therefore the universe is material and was created. 
 
 
Plato's cosmological argument premises 
1.) everything that begins to exists has a cause distinct from itself 
2.) the universe has a beginning 
3.) hence the universe has a cause distinc...
PHIL 347 Final Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
What is Mackie's argument from Evil? 
1. Omnipotent God exists 
2. Omnibenevolent God exists 
3. Evil exists 
 
 
What is Plantinga's aim of his free will defence 
To show that Mackie's premises are consistent 
 
 
How can you show that a set is consistent? (P,Q,R) 
You need a proposition S that is consistent with P & Q and in conjunction with P & Q implies R 
 
 
What is Plantinga's S term to for Mackie's argument to show ...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 4 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 1 out of 4 pages
PHIL 347 Final Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
What is Mackie's argument from Evil? 
1. Omnipotent God exists 
2. Omnibenevolent God exists 
3. Evil exists 
 
 
What is Plantinga's aim of his free will defence 
To show that Mackie's premises are consistent 
 
 
How can you show that a set is consistent? (P,Q,R) 
You need a proposition S that is consistent with P & Q and in conjunction with P & Q implies R 
 
 
What is Plantinga's S term to for Mackie's argument to show ...
PHIL 347 QUIZ 2 COMPLETE EXAM QUESTIONS WITH 100% CORRECT ANSWERS 
True or false: Claims can be presented without reasons or background information. 
True. 
 
 
A critical thinking assesses the _______ of the source and the __________ of the claim itself. 
Credibility, plausibility. 
 
 
When presented with a claim with no reasons, the critical thinker has options: 
Evaluate the credibility of the person making the claim, 
examine the plausibility of the claim itself, 
investigate the claim inde...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 2 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 1 out of 2 pages
PHIL 347 QUIZ 2 COMPLETE EXAM QUESTIONS WITH 100% CORRECT ANSWERS 
True or false: Claims can be presented without reasons or background information. 
True. 
 
 
A critical thinking assesses the _______ of the source and the __________ of the claim itself. 
Credibility, plausibility. 
 
 
When presented with a claim with no reasons, the critical thinker has options: 
Evaluate the credibility of the person making the claim, 
examine the plausibility of the claim itself, 
investigate the claim inde...
Phil 347 MT3 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
what are the 4 possible relationships of God to evil and how do they accord with God's character (4) 
- God is willing and able to get rid of evil (this one accords with the character of God) 
- God is willing and unable to get rid of evil (makes God feeble) 
- God is unwilling and able to get rid of evil (makes God lacking in goodness) 
- God is unwilling and unable to get rid of evil (makes God envious AND feeble) 
 
 
what is ...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 5 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 2 out of 5 pages
Phil 347 MT3 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
what are the 4 possible relationships of God to evil and how do they accord with God's character (4) 
- God is willing and able to get rid of evil (this one accords with the character of God) 
- God is willing and unable to get rid of evil (makes God feeble) 
- God is unwilling and able to get rid of evil (makes God lacking in goodness) 
- God is unwilling and unable to get rid of evil (makes God envious AND feeble) 
 
 
what is ...
PHIL 347 Quiz 1 |Complete Questions with A+ Graded Answers 
purpose of analysis 
find the speakers meaning 
first step is to find the speaker's conclusion and premises 
 
 
argument 
*-two or more declarative statements, at least one of which serves as evidence to support the truth or probable truth of the other. 
-not a quarrel, or a disagreement or a debate. 
 
 
claim 
refers to the statement that the maker of the argument is seeking to show is true or probably true, the conclusion 
 
 
Rea...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 1 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 1 out of 1 pages
PHIL 347 Quiz 1 |Complete Questions with A+ Graded Answers 
purpose of analysis 
find the speakers meaning 
first step is to find the speaker's conclusion and premises 
 
 
argument 
*-two or more declarative statements, at least one of which serves as evidence to support the truth or probable truth of the other. 
-not a quarrel, or a disagreement or a debate. 
 
 
claim 
refers to the statement that the maker of the argument is seeking to show is true or probably true, the conclusion 
 
 
Rea...
PHIL 347 Quiz 1 |Complete Questions with A+ Graded Answers 
What is the purpose of analysis? 
To find the speaker's meaning. 
 
 
What is the very first step of analysis? 
Find the speaker's conclusion and premises. 
 
 
Claim means 
The statement the maker of the argument is seeking to show is true or probably true, the conclusion. 
 
 
Claim can also be used to refer both ________ and ________. 
Premises; Conclusions. 
*The text refers to claim as the conclusion only* 
 
 
Argument 
Combina...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 3 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 1 out of 3 pages
PHIL 347 Quiz 1 |Complete Questions with A+ Graded Answers 
What is the purpose of analysis? 
To find the speaker's meaning. 
 
 
What is the very first step of analysis? 
Find the speaker's conclusion and premises. 
 
 
Claim means 
The statement the maker of the argument is seeking to show is true or probably true, the conclusion. 
 
 
Claim can also be used to refer both ________ and ________. 
Premises; Conclusions. 
*The text refers to claim as the conclusion only* 
 
 
Argument 
Combina...
Phil 347 Quiz 3 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers 
In conditional arguments if A then B A Therefore B is an example of: 
Valid form: Affirming the antecedent 
 
 
In conditional arguments, if A are B C is A therefore, C is B is an example of: 
Applying a generalization 
 
 
What are the two fallacies associated with deductive reasoning? 
Affirming the consequent and Denying the antecedent 
 
 
Which deductive reasonings are about relationships? 
Transitivity, reflexivity, and identity 
 ...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 2 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 1 out of 2 pages
Phil 347 Quiz 3 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers 
In conditional arguments if A then B A Therefore B is an example of: 
Valid form: Affirming the antecedent 
 
 
In conditional arguments, if A are B C is A therefore, C is B is an example of: 
Applying a generalization 
 
 
What are the two fallacies associated with deductive reasoning? 
Affirming the consequent and Denying the antecedent 
 
 
Which deductive reasonings are about relationships? 
Transitivity, reflexivity, and identity 
 ...
Phil 347 FINAL Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
The logical problem of evil 
The world is full of evil- theist and athesit agree. All knowing god knows there is evil, all good being would stop it and all powerful could stop it. All three can not stay if evil exists. 
 
 
Free will defense 
God maximized the goodness in the world by creating free being. A free being means that we have the choice to do evil things- A choice that some of us exercise. This preserves Gods goodness...
- Package deal
- Exam (elaborations)
- • 6 pages's •
-
PHIL 347•PHIL 347
-
PHIL 347 Exam Package deal Questions with 100% Correct Answers• By LectAZIIM
Preview 2 out of 6 pages
Phil 347 FINAL Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ 
The logical problem of evil 
The world is full of evil- theist and athesit agree. All knowing god knows there is evil, all good being would stop it and all powerful could stop it. All three can not stay if evil exists. 
 
 
Free will defense 
God maximized the goodness in the world by creating free being. A free being means that we have the choice to do evil things- A choice that some of us exercise. This preserves Gods goodness...